Editorial Policy

NewsPro is an AI-assisted news aggregation platform. We do not employ reporters or produce original journalism. We collect publicly available news from RSS feeds published by established news organisations, synthesize them using AI, and present multi-perspective summaries with clear attribution to the original sources.

We select sources based on the following criteria:

• Credibility: Preference for established news organisations with editorial standards.
• Diversity: We aim to include sources from multiple countries, political orientations, and languages to avoid echo chambers.
• Tiering: Sources are classified as Official (government/wire services), Public (mainstream media), or Editorial (independent/analytical).
• Transparency: State-funded or government-linked outlets are labelled as such.

Our AI pipeline follows these steps:

1. RSS feeds are parsed and articles saved to our database.
2. Articles covering the same event are clustered together.
3. A language model synthesizes a neutral lead summary, India-centric perspective, per-country perspectives, and an analysis section.
4. Each story is flagged automatically if it touches sensitive topic categories.
5. A human editor reviews and approves all stories before they are published.

No AI-generated story is published without manual review and approval by a human editor. All AI-generated content is labelled as "AI Summary" and presented alongside links to the original source articles. Editors may edit, reject, or request re-generation of any story.

Stories touching on sensitive topics — including India-Pakistan relations, Kashmir, communal issues, Gaza/Palestine, nuclear matters, terrorism, and more — are automatically flagged for mandatory human review before publication. Our classifier covers 20+ sensitive categories.

For such stories, editors are expected to:

• Verify that the summary is neutral and does not inflame or incite.
• Ensure attributions are accurate.
• Apply extra scrutiny to state-media sources on contested topics.
• Reject stories where AI-generated content could be misleading or harmful.

Every story links prominently to all original source articles. We display source names on story cards and in the per-source breakdown section. AI-generated summaries are clearly distinguished from original reporting. If any publisher believes their content has been misused, they should file a takedown request via our Grievance Officer.

If a published story contains a factual error introduced during AI synthesis, we will update or remove the story upon receiving a credible correction request through the Grievance Officer. Corrections are made transparently — we do not silently delete stories where a correction is substantive.

• We do not produce original reporting or conduct journalism.
• We do not fabricate quotes, events, or data.
• We do not publish unverified rumours or social media speculation as news.
• We do not accept payment to publish, promote, or suppress any story.
• We do not share individual reader data with advertisers.

Readers, publishers, and subjects of stories may submit complaints, correction requests, or feedback via the Grievance Officer. We are committed to responding within 24 hours and resolving editorial complaints within 15 days.